BS 8006

BS 8006-1:2010 Section 7 — Reinforced Slopes

BS 8006-1:2010+A1:2016Revision 2Required FoS ≥ 1

Use it in Slope

In a design, choose it under Analyze → Design factor set, and the PDF report runs it too. It runs several checks: to change one, copy that check from the library's New set.

Checked against the standard · Slope convention · Not yet validated

The governing check is the one with the highest utilisation (G3); the wet-slope check runs when r_u > 0.15 anywhere or a water table crosses the reinforced zone.

Known limitations

  • The ultimate limit state check always runs; the wet-slope check (FoS ≥ 1.3) runs only when the slope is wet (7.2.6). The result is the check with the higher utilisation.

Scope

  • Soil nails: BS 8006-1 Section 7 covers reinforcement placed in fill, not soil nails — design them to BS 8006-2.

Ultimate limit state — required FoS ≥ 1

Checked against the standard · Not yet validated

Known limitations

  • Table 21 gives ultimate values only; a helping dead load is taken at ×1.0 and a helping live load at ×0 (Slope convention, not the standard's).
  • A1:2016 deleted the 7.4.4.3 slices equation; ffs on the whole slice weight with the pore pressure scaled follows 7.2.1 and Figure 82 (medium confidence).
  • Layer rupture is divided by the fm entered on each element (7.2.3, Annex A); Annex A.2.2 gives fm = 1.50 for plain or galvanised steel in axial tension only.
  • Direct sliding across a layer takes a′·tanφ′p/fms and a′bc·c′/fms ÷ fs (6.5.3 form); fn does not apply.
  • Anchors, soil nails and piles are outside Section 7 and are unfactored; design soil nails to BS 8006-2.
  • Surfaces wholly outside the reinforcement should be checked to BS EN 1997-1 and its UK National Annex (7.4.3); Slope flags them.
  • Other strength models (Hoek–Brown, hyperbolic) are unfactored.

Values

Actions

Soil weightγUnfavorable×1.50
Favorable×1.50
Permanent loadγGUnfavorable×1.20
Favorable×1.00
Variable loadγQUnfavorable×1.30
Favorable×0.00
Seismic coefficientγE×1.00

Resistance

Earth / global resistanceγRe÷1.00

Materials

Effective cohesionγc′÷1.60
Friction (tanφ′)γφ÷1.00
Undrained strength (cu)γcu÷1.00
Shear strength (other models)—÷1.00

Reinforcement

Geosynthetic — ruptureγt÷1.00
Geosynthetic — pull-outγpo÷1.30
Geosynthetic — sliding acrossfs÷1.30
Steel strip — ruptureγt÷1.00
Steel strip — pull-outγpo÷1.30
Steel strip — sliding acrossfs÷1.30
Steel grid — ruptureγt÷1.00
Steel grid — pull-outγpo÷1.30
Steel grid — sliding acrossfs÷1.30

Sources

Document: BS 8006-1:2010+A1:2016

Actions

FactorValueSource
Soil weight — unfavorable×1.507.2.1, Table 21, ffs, PDF p145 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — ffs multiplies the whole slice weight (single source), and the pore pressure with it. A1:2016 deleted the 7.4.4.3 slices equation; 7.2.1 and Figure 82 (8.3.2.5) support this reading.
Soil weight — favorable×1.507.2.1, Table 21, ffs, PDF p145 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — ffs multiplies the whole slice weight (single source), and the pore pressure with it. A1:2016 deleted the 7.4.4.3 slices equation; 7.2.1 and Figure 82 (8.3.2.5) support this reading.
Permanent load — unfavorable×1.207.2.2, Table 21, ff, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Permanent load — favorable×1.007.2.2, Table 21, PDF p145 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — The table gives ultimate values only (its 1.0 is the serviceability column); a helping dead load is taken at ×1.0.
Variable load — unfavorable×1.307.2.2, Table 21, fq, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Variable load — favorable×0.007.2.2, Table 21, PDF p145 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — Table 21 gives no favourable factor; a helping live load is omitted (cf. walls Table 12 combination B, fq = 0).
Seismic coefficient×1.00Annex F, PDF p245 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — Annex F (informative) proposes no seismic method or partial factor.

Materials

FactorValueSource
Effective cohesion÷1.607.2.3, Table 21, fms on c′, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Friction (tanφ′)÷1.007.2.3, Table 21, fms on tan φ′p, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Undrained strength (cu)÷1.007.2.3, Table 21, PDF p145 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — Table 21 has no cu row; Section 6 Table 11 and Section 8 Table 22 give fms = 1.0.
Shear strength (other models)÷1.007.2.3, Table 21, PDF p145 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — BS 8006 gives no factor for other strength models; they are unfactored.

Resistance

FactorValueSource
Earth / global resistance÷1.007.2.1, Table 21, PDF p145 · Not yet validated

Reinforcement

FactorValueSource
Geosynthetic — rupture÷1.007.2.3, Table 21: fm consistent with the reinforcement and design life, PDF p146 · Not yet validated
Geosynthetic — pull-out÷1.307.2.4, Table 21, fp, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Geosynthetic — sliding across÷1.307.2.4, Table 21, fs, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Steel strip — rupture÷1.007.2.3, Table 21: fm consistent with the reinforcement and design life, PDF p146 · Not yet validated
Steel strip — pull-out÷1.307.2.4, Table 21, fp, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Steel strip — sliding across÷1.307.2.4, Table 21, fs, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Steel grid — rupture÷1.007.2.3, Table 21: fm consistent with the reinforcement and design life, PDF p146 · Not yet validated
Steel grid — pull-out÷1.307.2.4, Table 21, fp, PDF p145 · Not yet validated
Steel grid — sliding across÷1.307.2.4, Table 21, fs, PDF p145 · Not yet validated

Wet slope (7.2.6) — required FoS ≥ 1.3 · applies to wet slopes only

Checked against the standard · Slope convention · Not yet validated

"Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.

Known limitations

  • Runs when r_u > 0.15 anywhere or a water table crosses the reinforced zone (7.2.6).
  • Soil, loads and pull-out are unfactored and fn is not applied; layer rupture is divided by the element's fm (Slope convention).

Values

Actions

Soil weightγUnfavorable×1.00
Favorable×1.00
Permanent loadγGUnfavorable×1.00
Favorable×1.00
Variable loadγQUnfavorable×1.00
Favorable×1.00
Seismic coefficientγE×1.00

Resistance

Earth / global resistanceγRe÷1.00

Materials

Effective cohesionγc′÷1.00
Friction (tanφ′)γφ÷1.00
Undrained strength (cu)γcu÷1.00
Shear strength (other models)—÷1.00

Reinforcement

Geosynthetic — ruptureγt÷1.00
Geosynthetic — pull-outγpo÷1.00
Steel strip — ruptureγt÷1.00
Steel strip — pull-outγpo÷1.00
Steel grid — ruptureγt÷1.00
Steel grid — pull-outγpo÷1.00

Sources

Document: BS 8006-1:2010+A1:2016

Actions

FactorValueSource
Soil weight — unfavorable×1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Soil weight — favorable×1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Permanent load — unfavorable×1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Permanent load — favorable×1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Variable load — unfavorable×1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Variable load — favorable×1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Seismic coefficient×1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.

Materials

FactorValueSource
Effective cohesion÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Friction (tanφ′)÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Undrained strength (cu)÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.
Shear strength (other models)÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.

Resistance

FactorValueSource
Earth / global resistance÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — "Conventional limit equilibrium" is read as unfactored soil and loads with a lumped FoS ≥ 1.3.

Reinforcement

FactorValueSource
Geosynthetic — rupture÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — The reinforcement enters at its design strength TD = Tchar / fm (7.2.3); the lumped FoS of 1.3 covers the rest.
Geosynthetic — pull-out÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — A conventional analysis applies no pull-out factor; the lumped FoS of 1.3 covers it.
Steel strip — rupture÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — The reinforcement enters at its design strength TD = Tchar / fm (7.2.3); the lumped FoS of 1.3 covers the rest.
Steel strip — pull-out÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — A conventional analysis applies no pull-out factor; the lumped FoS of 1.3 covers it.
Steel grid — rupture÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — The reinforcement enters at its design strength TD = Tchar / fm (7.2.3); the lumped FoS of 1.3 covers the rest.
Steel grid — pull-out÷1.007.2.6, PDF p146 · Slope convention · Not yet validated — A conventional analysis applies no pull-out factor; the lumped FoS of 1.3 covers it.